WHO IS MALTA GROWING FOR?

Malta is still growing — but the island is also tightening. MONEY explores the demographic squeeze behind the headlines: migration-driven labour, an ageing workforce beneath the surface, and a country testing its limits in housing, services, and cohesion. New Beginnings starts with an honest question: Who is Malta growing for?

---

Malta's growth story is often told in numbers: GDP, employment, arrivals, cranes, investment, and confidence. It's the language of an economy that has learned how to stay busy and keep moving.

But the deeper story — the one shaping daily life, boardroom decisions, politics, and long-term sustainability — is demographic. Malta is not simply growing. Malta is changing who it is, at speed, and under strain.

Official estimates put Malta's population at 574,250 at the end of 2024, up 1.9% on the previous year, driven mainly by net migration of 10,614 people. A year earlier, the population reached 563,443 at the end of 2023, with a larger net migration figure of 20,960.

These are not abstract figures. They translate into the queue at Mater Dei, the rent you negotiate, the commute that eats your morning, the staffing crisis in hospitality, the pressure on schools, the pace of change in neighbourhoods, and the way employers plan — or can't plan.

And here's the crucial point: Malta has been treating this demographic shift as a by-product of growth. In reality, it has become the model's engine.

The honest baseline: Malta runs on migration

If you want to understand Malta's labour market, you start here: the scale of foreign labour is no longer marginal.

Jobsplus reports that, at the end of 2024, the number of employed foreign nationals in Malta and Gozo amounted to 123,772. That is not a niche workforce. It is a structural pillar.

The Central Bank of Malta has been even more direct about the transformation. In a 2025 policy note, it observed that Malta's population growth since 2000 has been driven mainly by a rise in the foreign working-age population, and that the share of foreign nationals in Malta's working-age population rose from 2.5% in 2000 to 31.8% in 2023. It also warns, in projections, that by 2035 the share of foreigners in the working-age population could climb to 45.9% from 30.4% in 2023.

This is the demographic squeeze in one sentence: Malta's economy has been sustained by younger foreign workers, while the native Maltese population ages underneath.

So the national question isn't "do we like migration?" That's too simplistic, and it's often where debate dies.

The real question is: do we have a model that can handle the scale of change we've already chosen?

Capacity is now a competitiveness issue

The most dangerous assumption in Malta's public debate is that capacity is a "quality of life" issue, while competitiveness is purely economic.

That's no longer true. Capacity is competitiveness.

When housing becomes unaffordable, recruitment gets harder. When transport becomes unreliable, productivity bleeds out. When services strain, trust erodes. When rules feel optional, the serious investor recalculates.

Malta's growth has collided with limits: physical (space, roads), social (integration, cohesion), and institutional (enforcement, systems, delivery). This is not pessimism. It is the lived reality of an island.

Housing: the pressure valve that keeps breaking

Housing is where demographic change becomes personal. For decades, Malta's identity was high home ownership and intergenerational stability. But the rental market has expanded rapidly, and affordability pressure has become a defining concern — one acknowledged institutionally, with the Housing Authority explicitly framing "improving rental affordability" as a core pillar of its work.

The point isn't whether Malta has schemes. The fact is whether policy is keeping up with the scale of demand.

When population growth is significantly driven by net migration, housing becomes the pressure valve. If that valve fails — if rents outpace wages, if supply doesn't match demand, if rules are unclear or unenforced — then the social contract frays: residents feel displaced, newcomers feel exploited, employers feel trapped, and politics becomes reactive.

A new beginning here isn't an argument about whether people should come. It is an argument about whether Malta will build a credible housing framework that protects fairness and stability for everyone.

The labour market paradox: we need people, but the model needs fewer people

Malta's labour market tells a paradoxical story. On the one hand, businesses genuinely struggle to find staff. On the other hand, the country's long-term sustainability depends on reducing reliance on ever-increasing headcount.

The Central Bank policy note makes the logic explicit: improving productivity and shifting toward a more capital-intensive economy could moderate population growth by slowing net foreign migration flows. This is the unspoken trade-off: if Malta continues to grow primarily through labour inflows, population growth will remain high, and capacity pressure will become a permanent feature rather than a temporary phase.

Business organisations have also been blunt about Malta's dependence on foreign labour and the need to confront productivity realities. In 2025, the Malta Chamber warned that debates like a four-day work week must be grounded in Malta's actual conditions: low unemployment, significant reliance on foreign labour, and low productivity.

New beginnings, in this context, mean changing the base model: paying people more because output is higher, not simply because the labour market is tight; running sectors with better systems; and rewarding firms that invest in skills and technology rather than scaling through volume.

Ageing: the quiet force underneath everything

Ageing is often treated as tomorrow's problem. Malta's data suggests it is a problem today, partly masked by migration.

The Central Bank notes that the native Maltese population is ageing, with a relatively low share of young cohorts and a higher share of older cohorts. In another Central Bank analysis, it's observed that the Maltese workforce has aged considerably, with those over 50 constituting 31% of all Maltese in employment, and that inflows of younger foreign workers have counteracted the underlying ageing dynamic in several sectors.

This matters because ageing changes the country's cost structure: healthcare, pensions, care work, and the need for a productive base strong enough to carry it.

If Malta doesn't raise productivity, the burden becomes a political fight over resources. If it does increase productivity, ageing becomes manageable.

That's the real pivot. Not ideology — arithmetic.

Integration: the part Malta avoids until it becomes a problem

Migration policy is often framed as a labour tool. That misses the human dimension—and the strategic one as well.

If Malta's workforce and population are increasingly diverse, integration is not a "soft" issue. It's operational. It affects workplace stability, social cohesion, and public confidence in institutions.

The most telling detail in the NSO migration data is not only scale, but composition. In 2024, non-EU nationals accounted for 76.6% of net migration. In 2023, the share was even higher: 93.1% of total net migrants.

That implies greater cultural distance, potentially more vulnerability to exploitation, and greater responsibility on the state and employers to ensure standards are enforced.

If Malta wants the benefits of labour inflows without the societal backlash, it needs rules that protect people and protect the country's legitimacy: enforce labour standards, crack down on abuse, and build integration mechanisms that are real rather than symbolic.

Public sector gravity: when the state becomes the talent magnet

Another pressure point is internal competition for talent. When the public sector grows, it can pull people from the "productive" private economy — not because public work is less valuable, but because wage structures, stability and hours shape incentives.

NSO-linked reporting indicates that Malta's public sector employed 54,398 full-time workers as of June 2025, accounting for about 18.3% of the total workforce.

This matters because Malta's new beginning is not just about attracting talent — it's about deploying talent well. A country cannot complain about productivity while structuring its incentives to drain specific sectors, or while allowing other sectors to operate on low-value-added volume.

So what is the "new social contract"?

A social contract is the agreement — sometimes explicit, often implied — about what a country offers and what it expects in return.

For Malta's next chapter, the social contract needs to be clearly stated, because the old one (grow, build, hire, repeat) is hitting its limits.

Here are five pillars that would make it real.

1) Productivity as national policy, not a lecture

Reward value creation. Make it easier for firms to automate, digitise, train, and export. Stop celebrating headcount as the primary marker of success.

2) A housing system that protects stability

If Malta wants growth, it must protect fundamental fairness: rental clarity, enforcement, and affordability tools that don't merely chase the problem.

3) Labour standards that are actually enforced

A migration-driven model without enforcement becomes a reputational and political time bomb. Fair rules protect locals, protect newcomers, and protect serious business.

4) Infrastructure that respects time

Time is economic output. The commute is not a lifestyle issue — it's a productivity tax.

5) Integration that is practical, not performative

Language access, basic civic orientation, pathways to stability for those who contribute, and clear consequences for abuse. The aim is not assimilation — it's cohesion.

The uncomfortable conclusion: Malta must choose the kind of country it is becoming

Demography is destiny, but it is not fate.

Malta has already chosen a growth path that depends heavily on foreign labour and migration-driven population change. The question is whether it will now build the systems, rules, and capacity to make that model sustainable — or whether it will continue improvising until social cohesion becomes collateral damage.

A new beginning doesn't mean slowing down for the sake of it. It means growing with intention: fewer vulnerabilities, better wages through productivity, and a society that can absorb change without losing trust in itself.

Because the real risk isn't diversity, the real risk is drift: a country changing faster than its institutions can hold, and calling it success because the numbers still look good.

---